Peter Nolan left australia, didnt want to pay child support, now he is attacking his kids to get back at his ex wife.. COWARD!!
Read his Loony rant here:
www_crimesagainstfathers_com_australia_Forums_tabid_82_forum
All we can say, Peter Andrew Nolan© is “we told you so” ..
Looks like the Republic of Eire’s quota of bullying fruit and nutjob stalkers was well and truly full! LOL!
nopedopolicy.jpeg
buggeroffbullylol.jpeg
Peter Nolan
In my case it was very simple.
I will NOT be the willing and complicit victim of a crime.
I WOULD RATHER DIS-OWN MY FORMER CHILDREN.
WHICH I DID.
MRAs are GUTLESS PUSSIES in the 99.9% majority.
MRAs DESERVE THEIR SLAVERY.
Just look at your post Rahul Patil. You imply you will allow yourself to be the victim of a crime just because someone points a gun at you?
That is COWARDICE.
You may have to beat a temporary retreat being unarmed in the moment. But if you are not willing to arm yourself and dispense summary justice all other options failing? That makes you a coward.
So? Are you are coward or not?
Are you willing to take up arms against an enemy? Against and oppressor if all other options fail?
I am.
And I will if needs be.
Why? Because OTHER MEN have done that for me and I ask no man to do what I will not do for myelf.
Loopy Pete, we ask again in this very public forum … February is looming, and we want to know who you are going to be putting on trial, where these silly “courts” will be held, and how you are going to enforce the “judgements”?
We mean, you’re not talking shit again, are you, Loopy Pete?
Oh, and by the way, how is your application for Irish Citizenship going? It seems to be bogged down a bit since the Garda received DOZENS on complaints about your little “open letter” campaign … we also hear that your FORMER business colleague (you won’t be doing ANY work associated with IBM ever again) has also made a statement.
Wake up call, Loopy Pete, just because a MAN doesn’t get his own way because he acts like a complete ill informed deadshit goose, you can’t go stalking people, and you can’t go setting up your own unrepresentative demented courts that have no meaning or relevance to anyone but you and Mark Fuckwit Flowers.
Mr Peter Andrew Nolan – common criminal, standover man, tax evader and deadbeat dad, on the run and living in a deluded state!
http://www.facebook.com/
18 hours ago
Peter, if you must create a false persona to act as your only “friend” and supportive voice on facebook, at least have the brains to not use the e-mail peter.nolan@peternolan.com … it sort of blows the subterfuge – GOOSE!
Here is a post that Mr Peter Nolan promptly removed from his “Mens Business Association” facebook group … apparently he doesn’t want his membership to know that the admin “Joshua Johns” is in fact Nolan’s fradulent sock puppet and they are being lied to by him.
What else have you been dishonest about, Loopy Pete?
Meanwhile it was comedy central at the Men’s Rights Movement facebook group when “Joshua Johns” – who had been making mysteriously supportive statements of every Loopy Pete rant – claimed after we “outed” him he was in fact a real person but His Loopiness was letting him use one of his e-mail addresses so he could protect his identity.
Like so many “men’s rights” site across the world wide web, “Joshua Johns” and Loopy Pete were promptly booted from the group …
Mr Nolan, you are a liar and fraud, who will even peddle your deceit in the communities you are seeking support from!
We usually don’t endorse stalking, but we do admit to becoming great fans of the work of one Chris Merrett Mbe, or as he prefers to call himself “The AntiNolan“
theantinolan.jpegLoopy Pete has even dedicated a blig slab of his travesty of a “website” Slimes Against Fathers to The AntiNolan!
Keep up the good work, Chris!
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 05 January 2012 23:03
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject:
Hey Pedro, can I expect to recieve my summons to appear before your new courts sometime soon? I sure hope so. As already indicated, I’m more than willing to appear before any assembly of your MEN. But be advised, I will only answer a summons if it’s hand delivered. Any supposed summons “served” electronically will be considered spam and will be treated as such. But a personally delivered summons will be answered. Be assured. And Peter, with all this effort you’ve gone to “track me down”, have you ever considered the Telstra White Pages ? I bet you haven’t !! Well done Sherlock. LOL
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 06 January 2012 00:31
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE:
So, no answer hey Peter ? Well then, according to your repeated assertions that “silence is consent” you therefore agree that your “courts” will never have any existence anywhere apart from in your own alcohol addled, manic-depressive bi-polar mind. That’s good Peter, admitting to your delusions is a sign of progress. You may well be able to at least function as a relatively normal human being one of these days. But you’re going to need a lot of therapy. And of course will need to continue taking your prescription mood stabilizers for a long time to come, possibly for life, but never mind.
——————————————————————————–
Subject: Re:
To: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
From: peter@peternolan.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:17:22 +0000
You really do write a lot of rubbish.
You are obviousl a very bad father setting such a terrible example for your children.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 06 January 2012 12:31
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE:
LOL you still think your courts are real ! Peter! Snap out of it ! They aren’t real. And they never will be Peter. Even if you ever get 12 MEN who are willing to step out of cyber space and assemble in some hired venue at a Leagues Club, or more likely in someone’s shed, it still won’t be a court of any authority. It will be nothing more than a group of aggrieved misfits playing make-believe.
But that having been said, I have spoken to my alleged publisher and she has agreed that I can pass on her contact details.
Trading Name – Sly Ink
Name of PERSON Kerry A Rzeznik
Level 3
650 St Kilda Road
Melbourne Vic.
3004
+61403056891
She’s awaiting correspondence from you with bated breath.
Now then. So, I’m to be invited to your new courts? Ok, what if I choose to decline? Not that I will decline, I’ve been looking forward to this for a long time. Many people have. I’ll be there for sure and certain Peter, providing of course I can verify that I won’t be going out on a wild goose chase, that there will actually be someone there.
So tell me, if this ever actually takes place, and a remedy instruction is issued, say for example for me to pay you a sum of money, what happens when I tell you and your jury to shove it up their arse ? Peter, what you don’t seem to understand is that you are the only REAL person on earth who really believes all this rot. But never mind, like I said, I’ll be there with bells on.
So, when is all this scheduled to take place and where? Never and nowhere I guess, but I’ll play along.
And also, just to let you know that you aren’t entirely useless, I’ve actually managed to secure another fairly good pay day on the back of your misfortune and litany of mental illnesses. I’m around halfway through assembling a case study of your story from the point that XXXXXXXX decided to boot you off, which as you now no doubt know was around 18 months before you were carted off kicking and screaming by the Police that fine Easter Sunday. I was asked to do a case study of this nature to be included in a University lecturer’s teaching manual. It’s to be used in the coming educational year in Sociology and Anthropology Diploma courses. And before you ask, no I haven’t changed your or anyone else’s name, and I’m not going to. Peter, your name is NOT subject to copyright. That’s just another fantasy.
There you go, I answered the big question. And as I’ve indicated I’ll answer any other question you direct at me, providing you answer mine.
Have Fun Punchy Pete.
P.S: I thought you were having facebook remove all the other Peter Andrew Nolans on facebook using your likeness? I have 19 of you on one of my lists now. What’s going on ?
——————————————————————————–
Subject: Re:
To: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
From: peter@peternolan.com
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 07:11:47 +0000
Chrissy wissy,
You have still not provided the list of your alleged publishers.
You are yet to answer a single question from me.
You are about to be invited to our new courts and given your chance to defend your criminal actions. I would argue your criminal actions are not defensible.
We shall see what a jury of your peers say about that.
You are pretty much an irrelevancy. I do have much bigger fish to fry. But you will be processed through the new courts in due time. The only way you will not be processed is if you are dead.
As i said. I am only doing you as an example of all that is bad about australian fathers now. I am sure you will make a very good example to young men of how NOT to be.
Peter
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 07 January 2012 11:23
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: a challenge
OK Pedro, since you have all this support and all these MEN who are going to sit on JURIES in your new courts, lets see if you can persuade one, just a single solitary one to give you your first example of real world existence apart from this massive cyber wank you’ve been having for the last 4 years. I want just a single one to meet with me over a coffee to discuss your plans and future direction to reintroduce the rule of law into Australia. There are no threats implied here, indeed I give a total guarantee of personal safety to anyone who is prepared to represent you anywhere in the real world.
Don’t give me this crap about working hard for others. This entire this has been nothing but a failed attempt at self promotion, everyone, even the handful of followers you do have, eg: Mark Flowers and Dubious can see that.
This all boils down to the fact XXXXXXXX saw you for what you truly were and was no longer prepared to put up with your controlling ways and debilitating insecurities, and the fact that you just couldn’t get it through your head that the marriage was over, and that despite your feelings to the contrary she had every right to have you booted out. She would never have managed to get you out of her life any other way. But that’s the point isn’t it Peter? As far as you were concerned, because you wre married to her she was an item of your property and had no rights over her own life. You felt she had to stay with you and obey you regardless, didn’t you?
Have you contacted my publisher yet? I’d wager no. And I bet you won’t either.
Show me how much real world progress you’ve made Pedro. One person who is prepared to stand up in the real world and say “I support Peter Nolan”. Go ahead.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 01:14
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Another Fail
Well Pedro, you’ve been exposed as the seriel shit-talker you truly are once again. I’ve just spoken to my publisher Kerry Rzeznik, and just as I predicted no contact from you. You are the only one apart from Mark Flowers, Dubios that actually believe your own shit. Give it away chubby, your run is almost over. Return to Australia volutarily rather than under extradition, do your time, pay your bills and attempt to rebuild what’s left of your life. You go on about being a MAN. Step up and show us that lurking deep inside somewhere that there is some semblance of contrition for your outrageous behaviour and some desire to get treatment for your chronic, medically diagnosed bi-polar disease. Why won’t you admit to this debilitating illness? There’s no shame in suffering from the condition, only in refusing to accept the reality of it and get help. Hasn’t it ruined your life enough already? You still have time to live a productive life rather than the hand-to-mouth existence you’re living at the moment. If you behave yourself you may even wiggle off the Canadian hook. You know the one we mean. But you do owe XXXXXXXX quite a sum and you will be forced to pay your debt, one way or the other. You are only putting off the inevitable. man up Peter.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 01:55
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: your fake id’s
And Peter you dumbarse, if your going to persist in creating false id’s like John Rambo, Robert Kennedy and all the others, at least learn how to hide your original isp when using proxy servers. LOL
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 07:52
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE: a challenge
so if you haven’t heard of my publisher it means they don’t exist ? LOL
——————————————————————————–
Subject: Re: a challenge
To: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
From: peter@peternolan.com
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 03:32:47 +0000
Chris,
You are a waste of space and a criminal.
You have been asked for contact details of all people you claim have published your lies. So far i see one email with a name that i have not seen before.
You are a criminal and will be treated as such. There is no point talking to you or organising anyone to talk to you. You will be served with my affidavits of accusation and invited to deny the accusaions under oath and penalty of perjury.
I suggest you just agree to send me aud10,000 now. Otherwise you will be charged my time for sending you the affidavits of accusation and the courts time.
You are toast chris. Men like you need to be exposed as the man haters and criminaks you are.
I do not negotiate with man haters and criminals. I put them on trial.
Enjoy your last days of relative wealth.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 07:59
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE: a challenge
So the answer is you can’t produce a soul in the real world to back you up,, LOL. Not even one of the handful that pretend to support you, but as you’ve said yourself many times in your blanket emails that we get direct to our inbox and always will no matter how hard you try, everyone has. For some reason they pander to you online, I myself run 2 profiles you interact with regularly and consider supporters, I damn near piss myself sometimes over how easily led you are. Peter, the only one who’d going to finish up in a real court will be you. Try reality some time Pedro, you’re lifelong bi-polar disease is playing tricks on you. So,, who’s going to trial? Me, Roubis, Jennifer, Juliar Gillard,, who else, the POPE ? lol
—–Original Message—–
From: Chris Merrett [mailto:chrismerrett257@aol.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 10:07
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Man Love.
Hey Pedro, I was just reading one of your for a piece I’m doing at the moment, and I came across a passage where you state you ” love ALL men”,,,,,,,, does that mean you love me too? And Roubis, Potsy, Wayne etc? Really LOVE us? or not in our case I guess.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 13:57
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE: a challenge
You aren’t too bright are you Peter? Why are you denying I gave you my publishers name? Is that part of the bi polar thing ?
——————————————————————————–
Subject: Re: a challenge
To: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
From: peter@peternolan.com
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 10:40:30 +0000
Six more emails this morning.
They will just go into my folder for you.
You have consistently failed to answer the simplest of questions while pretending to be “upset” your questions are not answered.
You will be asked for your alleged publishers by the court and to refuse to give full details will be contempt of court for which you can be indefinitely incarcerated in very poor quality cells.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 08 January 2012 22:48
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: RE:
You’re a dickhead Peter, that’s the 3rd time I’ve sent those details to you, try to keep up. LOL. And even if it had taken months, which it hasn’t, it’s better than never like you ya boxhead. LOL
——————————————————————————–
Subject: Re:
To: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
From: peter@peternolan.com
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:30:12 +0000
There. That was not hard was it?
Why has it taken you MONTHS to answer your first question eh?
I shall be contacting kerry in due course.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 11 January 2012 00:52
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: tory shepard
LOL, your manias progressively worsen, only the rate of your descent into total insanity varies, and it’s gathering pace Pedro. Just flicked through your latest rants re these 2 fine people. You really are losing your mind Peter. Your desperate chains of reasoning are getting wilder and wilder by the day. Oh well, you know the game is almost over so I guess I can empathize with your increasing desperation. In for a penny in for a pound hey Punchy? Take your meds Peter, get help. And get some REAL legal advise, real quick.
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 11 January 2012 14:25
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: Credit Card
Pedro, you really should try to be more diligent with your privacy. Your credit card statements make interesting reading. A little wierd maybe, but interesting nonetheless. 
—–Original Message—–
From: chris merrett [mailto:chrismerrett@live.com]
Sent: 13 January 2012 05:19
To: peter@peternolan.com
Subject: keep em coming
I need some more material to continue profiting from the misery of idiots like you, got any more ? I’m doing a piece on mental dwarfs such as yourself and Dr. John Wilson who’s at least your equal in the ranting stakes. But even Wilson, barking nutcase that he is is perplexed by your retardation. He’s doing all he can to distance himself from you. The world must be a lonely place when you only have one single supporter who thinks your fantasies can ever become realities.
—–Original Message—–
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:peter@peternolan.com]
Sent: 14 January 2012 16:04
To: ’Kerry Rzezkik’
Cc: ’chris merrett ‘
Subject: Re: Inquiry as to an allegation about publishing slander about Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
@Gentlemen,
Kerry Rzezkik alleges he/she is the sub-editor for the criminal slanderer Chris Merrett at Sly Ink. Chris has taken many months to give me contact details for Kerry.
This email is only relevant for those people who want to keep up with the cases of slander by Chris Roubis and “Illuminati Ingrid” as we have evidence Chris Merrett is co-operating with Ingrid in this criminal slander. Since this slander of people like Tim, John, Mark, myself has been quite widespread I am working my way back to their employers who are aiding and abetting known criminals.
If not relevant to you please just delete.
Chris Merrett seems so delusional that he said “just google sly ink”. Well the google results show a very non descript company. Not even a web site.
http://www.hotfrog.com.au/Companies/S…
http://www.austcrimefiction.org/categ…
Thanks
Your brother peter
Hi Kerry,
For a start, MR. NOLAN is a juristic person. You seem to be unaware of this. You are a very ignorant person it seems.
My calling is Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) and that is what you are invited to use. Why would you try to talk to a juristic person?
I have a starting question. I will number my questions to make it easier for you to keep track of your answers.
Q1. Are you male or female?
I ask this because you have failed to answer any of my very direct questions with direct answers. This is a typical response of women, though Chris Merrett also indulges himself in this behaviour. It has taken him many months to provide me your contact details. So I was wondering if you are female. You write like one.
“To be honest I must say I derive some amusement from your statement that one of my writers is mentally unhinged”
I recommend you read what Chris has been saying then.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
You wish to make the claim that comments like these would come from someone who is NOT mentally unhinged? You are kidding me, right?
“I can confirm that Chris Merrett is one of many freelance writers employed by me in my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink.”
I didn’t ask you if Chris Merrett was one of your freelance writers. Let me repeat the questions and number them. Please answer the questions I ask and please do not make irrelevant and misleading comments that you were not asked about.
Q2. Are you publishing materials about me provided to you by this criminal slanderer?
Q3. Are you paying this man to publish such materials?
Now. You have not answered these two questions and I would like answers to those two questions please.
“your allegations will not change this”
“Mr Merrett being only one of 3 writers that have been working on your particular case. The vast majority of this information has been gleaned from your own material.”
I claim that your other writers have the right to know that they are in serious trouble of being associated with a serious crime. They also have the right to know that my calling and name are copyrighted worldwide and should they choose to use my calling or name without my permission they will be held accountable for copyright infringement. I suggest you pass me their work email addresses so that I can inform them of this directly. I will post this to CAF so they know you were asked for this information and WHEN you were asked for this information.
“my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink”
I assume you have an editor and or publisher you work for. I recommend you pass me the name and email address of the most senior person in your company so that I can also issue a Lawful Notice to him/her as to the criminal acts being committed by someone in his/her employ.
Q4. What is the calling and contact details for your editor/publisher and the most senior person in your company.
That you have responded with my initial email in the reply is taken as evidence that you have been well informed that my calling and name are copyrighted worldwide and that any further use of my name, calling or image by you, your company or anyone in your employ is a copyright infringement. You are a publisher. You should know about copyright infringement.
Now. Some axioms of law that you might wish to keep in mind. These will be applied to you.
“Ignorance of the law is no excuse”.
And by law that actually means natural law which is commonly called “common law” and not legislation created by UCC legal entities like the commonwealth of Australia.
“All men (and women who claim equality just in case you are female) are equal before the law”.
As far as I am aware you have committed no crimes. Later this week I will issue you with a Lawful Notice.
Q5. Are you willing to accept Lawful Notices to your fax machine or email to save on sending paper from Germany to Melbourne? Save a tree and all that? Should you agree to receive Lawful Notices this way I shall return the favour and accept electronically transmitted documentation.
The Lawful Notice will lay out my proposed remedy pending you giving direct answers to my direct questions.
Q6. If you have, indeed, published any articles containing my calling, name or image of me, please provide PDF copies of the full magazine in which these articles were published. According to Chris Merrett he has been publishing slander about me.
“I also find it amusing that you seem to sincerely believe you can circumvent the Australian Justice System by starting your own.”
You seem to be unaware of the position in which you find yourself in Australia today. The Australian Federal Government is a criminal cartel and it is in league with the banks, the legal fraternity, the MEDIA, the police and the medical fraternity just to name a few of the components of the control grid in which you live. You are living in a police state and you seem to not even be aware of this.
You seem to not have read this letter by Sir Harry Gibb on the Constitutional Crisis. He specifically makes the point that there is no basis in law for the judiciary to be acting.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
You seem also to be unaware of the great work done by the likes of Ian Henke in proving that the federal government is a bunch of criminals and that the Tax Office was not legally created.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
As a “sub-editor” of some sort of “investigative journalism” I would have thought you would know that the entire legal framework of Australia is a giant hoax. After all? I walked into the Australian Federal Magistrates Court on November 26th 2009 and video recorded a man calling himself David Dunkley commit the crime of impersonating a federal magistrate and I put that video on you tube about a year later. Surely Chris has pointed you to this video, right? It is one of the most significant pieces of video evidence created against the criminals in the parliament.
Perhaps you might read some of these Lawful Notices. Take particular note of the one to the members of the federal parliament.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
So. While I have been working on creating an alternative system of law and establishing a lawful judiciary outside the control of these criminals? You seem to be saying to me that you have been paying a man to slander me. I am wondering if that is really what you have been doing. Hence I am asking you for copies of any materials that you have published that contain my calling, my name or my image.
As I said. So far you are not guilty of any crime as far as I know. You seem to be guilty of an extraordinary level of stupidity and ignorance as well as seem to be quite arrogant about that stupidity and ignorance. But being stupid, ignorant and arrogant are not crimes that I am aware of.
Should you refuse to hand over to me all materials published by your company that include my calling, name or image and you have, in fact, published such? This will be the crime of suppression of evidence of a crime. We will get such evidence at a later date via the new courts.
Should you attempt to interfere with the process of putting Chris Merrett on trial or should you further engage Chris Merrett in any capacity what so ever that will be the crime of aiding and abetting a known criminal. You are now aware Chris Merrett is a criminal. It does not matter how long you have known him. It does not matter what you think of him. So those comments you make are not relevant. I knew my ex wife for 32 years before she decided to become a criminal.
Chris now has the same status as a bank robber, paedophile or rapist. That of being a criminal. To assist him you will be committing the same crime as if you are assisting a bank robber, a paedophile or a rapist.
That it will take us a little time to organize our courts and put him on trial is hardly our fault. We are doing the best we can despite criminal slanderers like Chris Merrett attempting to disrupt that process.
To be clear. Chris Merrett has publicly called me a wife beater and a paedophile which is the crime of slander.
He has falsely alleged connections to convicted criminals which is the crime of slander.
A person does not become a criminal when they are found guilty. They become a criminal when they commit the crime. Now you know he has committed these crimes and the evidence he has committed them has been presented to you any aid or support to this man is aiding and abetting a known criminal and you will be accused of this crime in due process should you commit it.
Chris is not “accused” of a crime. He IS a criminal. There is a BIG difference. All the evidence for this has been presented into the public. The process of finding him GUILTY of being a criminal will be run in due course.
If you allow your other writers to present slander about me in the future you will be accused of aiding and abetting their crime of slander as well.
You say “I have total faith in the veracity of any article he submits for publication, as I do all of my freelancers and”. Given this?
Q7. Are you also willing to accept lawful responsibility for what your writers put into your magazine?
This means that if one of your writers commits slander are you willing to also take responsibility for what is printed or are you willing to merely be held as aiding and abetting a known criminal?
Your choice.
If you are so confident of the veracity of your writers then you should have no problem being accountable before a court of law for anything they write that is slanderous, right? So put your money where your mouth is. Lets see if you are willing to put in writing that you are prepared to also stand trial for slander should anything Chris Merrett has published in your magazine turn out to be slanderous. Are you willing to do that?
So. Kerry.
I have asked you SEVEN very simple and very direct questions. Most of them are Yes or No answers. Others are very simple questions to provide me with information.
Lets see if you can “act like a man” and actually answer the questions put to you this time, eh?
After all. Chris Merrett has a psychopathic inability to answer questions. It took him MONTHS to answer the question of your contact details. Seems he does not share the same confidence in you as you allege you have in him.
Oh. By the way?
Chris is the most hopeless “investigator” I have ever met. He claims Robert Kennedy and John Rambo are myself. Laughable.
He also claims he can not find the evidence my wife is a perjurer despite the fact it is published here.
http://www.crima…
Kerry.
Chris Merrett is a mentally unstable man who is a criminal slanderer. If you can not see that then your perception skills must be totally appalling. I will bring this to the attention of your bosses as you are creating liabilities for them that they are well advised not to undertake. I am pretty sure that the further up I go the better hearing I will get as to how terrible your perception skills must be to allow this man to write for your magazine.
Lastly? The Commonwealth of Australia is a UCC Legal Entity Registered on the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore all legislation of the COA is UCC based legislation and NOT LAW. All my communication is issued under natural law also called Common Law. All disputes will be handled in the Peoples Court of Australia that we are establishing. The price of slandering me is $A10,000 per incident. So I am very keen for you to put your money where you mouth is and agree to ALSO be liable for any slander published about me. I plan to collect. If you are so sure of yourself you will have no problems betting your house on it, eh?
After all the criminals in the courts took my house off me. Only fair I take your house off you and Chris, eh?
I look forward to your answers to my SEVEN questions.
Have a good weekend.
Peter-Andrew: Nolan©
Mr Nolan,
Thank you for you interesting email. I can confirm that Chris Merrett is one of many freelance writers employed by me in my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink.
To be honest I must say I derive some amusement from your statement that one of my writers is mentally unhinged, given not only the contents of your emails to me, but also given the information provided to me by my writers, Mr Merrett being only one of 3 writers that have been working on your particular case. The vast majority of this information has been gleaned from your own material.
I also find it amusing that you seem to sincerely believe you can circumvent the Australian Justice System by starting your own.
I have known Chris Merrett personally for over 11 years, and have engaged him in a professional capacity since 2004. I have total faith in the veracity of any article he submits for publication, as I do all of my freelancers and your allegations will not change this.
Kerry Rzeznik.
1. My calling and the name PETER ANDREW NOLAN are copyrighted world wide. And I can revoke rights to use my copyrighted materials to anyone I choose. The contract is here.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
You are hereby noticed that any future use of my calling or name or any derivation of such will be a copyright infringement. Please note the fee for this.
5. At this moment, as far as I am aware, you have not committed any crime. Hence I am writing to you to ask you if you have unwittingly associated yourself with a crime.
If you have published slander about me then the crime is with Chris Merrett, not yourself. However, now that you have been informed of this crime, should you have inadvertently published slander, you are obliged by common law to hand over any and all evidence you have of this crime and you are required to co-operate fully in order to bring prosecution of this crime to our new courts.
Failure to fully co-operate bring a known criminal in your employ to justice will result in a criminal accusation of aiding and abetting a known criminal. “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” and by that is meant common law. Your lawyers are no good to you as they do not perform law services. They “practice law” which means they are NOT performing law. Lawyers only deal with legislation and statutes. They do NOT deal with law. And the jurisdiction I am applying is common law.
I am a sovereign and I retain the right to perform all LAW pertaining to myself and my property.
6. I would strongly recommend you do not dismiss this email and do not consider that I can not do what I say I can do.
We are about to put all federal politicians on trial. If you have, in fact, published slander about me and refuse to assist me remedy that crime by aiding and abetting a known criminal, then you too will be prosecuted.
As I mentioned. I believe these are just the delusional ramblings of a man who is mentally unhinged.
I can not imagine any sensible publisher would believe a word Chris Merrett writes. I am sure that as a publisher you will be aware of his on line activities and his regular slandering of people.
Congrats to Chris Merrett Mbe – AKA “The AntiNolan” for his fine prose as an author in a chapter of Sly Ink’s latest phenomenal “Underbelly” true crime instalment!
wordsmith.jpegWhat we love about Merrett’s masteful prose in his chapter “Mysoginists, misfits, maniacs and morons” is that in addition to his masterful prose, he took Loopy Pete apart using his own words from numerous manic e-mails he bombarded the author with, and from Mr Nolan’s serial loopiness all across the World Wide Web!
Giving Loopy Pete’s wacky sidekick Maniacal Mark Flowers a touch up along the way was the icing on the cake!
Fellow Nolan and Flowers Haters – do yourselves a favour, and support a True Blue Aussie publishing venture while you’re at it, and buy a copy of Sly Ink’s latest Underbelly instalment, which is available at all good book shops.
The highlight is no doubt the masterful chapter by “The AntiNolan”, which Loopy Peter largely managed to write himself – Laugh Out Loud stuff, especially when you know that Merrett isn’t making this stuff up!
For paper mail our address is:
Bd Gheorghe Magheru 7, Ap. 73
Sector 1
10322 Bucharest
Romania